New laser therapy quickly halts diabetic maculopathy - Ophthalmology Times Europe
SEARCH
  • home
  • about us
  • contact us
  • subscribe
  • media kit request
 

CATARACT

GLAUCOMA

REFRACTIVE

RETINA

New laser therapy quickly halts diabetic maculopathy
2RT treats disease early & leaves photoreceptors unharmed


Ophthalmology Times Europe

Pages | 1 | 2
more

The cumulative experience of more than 20 years of treating retinal diseases with a variety of lasers has taught clinicians and researchers one very important lesson: less is more.

A laser therapy [Retinal Regeneration Therapy (2RT); Ellex] that uses extremely short (3 nanosecond) pulses of laser energy to stimulate the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) to create a sort of renewal process within the retina may represent the culmination of this experience. This therapy could lead to a reduction in disease progression, together with a loss of retinal changes, as well as preservation or improvement of functional vision.

What do the studies tell us?


Key points to note
In the first clinical study of the therapy, a Q-switched 532 nm laser was used to treat 29 eyes of 18 patients with either newly diagnosed or previously treated diabetic maculopathy. Patients had diffuse maculopathy and were in need of treatment as defined by the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) guidelines.

Patients underwent laser treatment using a standard recommended ETDRS grid pattern; the number of spots used depended on the size of the clinically significant macular oedema. All patients were seen at three weeks, six weeks and three months following laser treatment.

The preliminary results demonstrated that the majority of patients experienced improvement in visual acuity, as well as improvement in central macular thickness (CMT) as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), as early as six weeks. Sixteen patients (55%) experienced a decrease in CMT of >5% and CMT remained within ±5% in seven patients (24%).

Furthermore, microperimetry did not reveal any evidence of laser damage to the photoreceptor cells. This was not the case with standard laser photocoagulation, where photoreceptor cells lose function in patients and typically do not show any improvement until three months after laser treatment.

Laser treatment as it used to be

In the 1970s, when lasers were first used to treat ocular vascular diseases, it quickly became apparent that firing a laser in front of the new vessels worsened the disease. Trial and error led to the development of panretinal photocoagulation to treat diabetic retinopathy, with laser spots placed in the periphery, whereas for diabetic maculopathy and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), laser spots were placed directly over areas of pathology if they were not too close to the fovea.

In retrospect, the major element of therapeutic benefit derived from retinal laser therapy was the triggering of changes within the RPE. In attempting to deliver sufficient laser energy to the RPE, however, too much energy was used, causing the entire thickness of the retina to be destroyed. In short, the treatment killed the very cells that were intended to be preserved.

In theory, if one is able to keep the laser energy within the RPE, then the function of the pigment epithelium and Bruch's membrane will be improved, allowing the transport mechanisms supplying the outer retina to return to a more normal and healthy function.

In previous studies using conventional lasers to improve macular function by firing at drusen, results were not very successful. In fact, the risk of neovascularization increased. This occurrence was not surprising considering that only a few laser spots (typically between 10 and 12) were made, and each one destroyed photoreceptor cells.


Pages | 1 | 2
more

On a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest, how would you rate this article?
Your original vote has been tallied and is included in the ratings results.
View our top pages
Average rating for this page is: 9.25
post a comment
Your email address will NOT be published.
appears with your comment
read our privacy policy
Note: does not support HTML
All comments submitted are subject to review and may be delayed before posting. We reserve the right not to post comments.
WHAT DO YOU THINK?

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

RATE THIS ARTICLE

YOUR COMMENTS

Survey
What has been the factor affecting your patient numbers the most this year?
The economy
Earlier screening for common diseases
Availability of anti-VEGF treatment
Aging population
Other
The economy
32%
Earlier screening for common diseases
16%
Availability of anti-VEGF treatment
32%
Aging population
16%
Other
5%
View Results
If you would like to comment on this topic further, please JOIN THE DEBATE.
Source: Ophthalmology Times Europe,
Click here