The new generation Crystalens better than the rest? - Ophthalmology Times Europe

ADVERTISEMENT

CATARACT

GLAUCOMA

REFRACTIVE

RETINA

The new generation Crystalens better than the rest?
FDA study shows excellent vision is achieved at all distances


Ophthalmology Times Europe
Volume 4, Issue 1


In short...
The first generation Crystalens accommodating intraocular lens (IOL) (eyeonics) was approved by the FDA in November 2003 and has since undergone two revisions. The first involved modification of the lens optic to a "square" rather than smooth edge in order to reduce the incidence of asymmetric capsular fibrosis, which could cause capsular contraction and IOL tilt (AT-45). The second revision involved enlarging the lens optic to 5 mm, modifying the haptic plates to a more square shape, for increased capsular support, and increasing the arc length of the haptics for greater stability (Five-0). Each of these revisions provided greater stability and predictability.

In order to increase functional near vision with this lens, a third revision was made and the ensuing lens is known as the Crystalens HD. In lab testing, this lens provided greater depth of field than the parent AT-45 lens and better contrast as measured by modulation transfer function, an objective measure of contrast, than ReSTOR (Alcon) or ReZoom (AMO) implants.

We were involved in a FDA multicentre study, the purpose of which was to determine surgical outcomes with this new fourth-generation lens and to establish whether it would degrade contrast acuity in human subjects.

Who's in and who's out

After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval of the study protocol, a total of 125 primary eyes were implanted with the Crystalens HD. Inclusion criteria included patients aged 18 years or over, presence of a visually significant cataract, less than 1 D of corneal astigmatism and the potential for best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/25 or better in both eyes.

Surgery was performed using standard phacoemulsification techniques and the lens was implanted using an injector system. Postoperatively, patients were evaluated at one day, seven to 14 days, one to two months, and four to six months.


Figure 1
For analysis of uncorrected and distance-corrected visual acuity VA, we selected patients who achieved a target refraction within 0.5 D of the intended target. We also conducted a comparison of monocular uncorrected and distance-corrected near VA with results of a randomly selected, similar sized group of patients from prior studies of the parent lens, AT-45, and the third-generation Crystalens Five-0.

Facts and figures


Figure 2
Sixty eyes remained in follow-up by the four to six month mark and were within 0.5 D of intended target. Mesopic contrast sensitivity testing with and without glare (Figures 1 & 2) revealed no significant difference between Crystalens HD eyes and eyes tested previously with the AT-45 parent lens. A monocular uncorrected distance VA (UCDVA) of 20/40 was achieved by 100% of patients, 20/32 by 86.6%, 20/25 by 61.6% and 20/20 by 41.6% of patients. Monocular uncorrected intermediate VA (UCIVA) of 20/40 was achieved in 100% of patients, 20/32 by 96.6%, 20/25 by 93.3% and 20/20 by 80% of patients. Monocular uncorrected near VA (UCNVA) of J3 was achieved by 100% of patients, J2 by 80% and J1 by 55% of patients.


On a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest, how would you rate this article?
Your original vote has been tallied and is included in the ratings results.
View our top pages
Average rating for this page is: 5.2
WHAT DO YOU THINK?

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Rate this article
Your comments
Discuss on our forum
Follow us on Twitter

 

Survey
Which clear corneal incision technique do you use the most?
Three-plane incision
Single-plane angled manual incision
Three-plane incision
40%
Single-plane angled manual incision
60%
Source: Ophthalmology Times Europe,
Click here