Integrin inhibition as a potential treatment for dry eye - Ophthalmology Times Europe

ADVERTISEMENT

CATARACT

GLAUCOMA

REFRACTIVE

RETINA

Integrin inhibition as a potential treatment for dry eye


Ophthalmology Times Europe
Volume 8, Issue 5

Dry eye disease is a multifactorial disease of the tear film and ocular surface that produces symptoms of chronic ocular discomfort.1 An estimated 25 million people in western Europe have dry eye disease and the prevalence is increasing as the general population is ageing.2

Over the past decade, significant progress has been made into understanding the basic pathophysiology observed in dry eye disease. An emerging body of research has provided insights into the chronic inflammatory nature of dry eye and revealed potential clues for the design of novel treatments.3,4

Currently, only cyclosporine emulsion (0.05%) is approved in the US for dry eye; no pharmaceutical dry eye treatments are approved in Europe. Cyclosporine is approved for increasing tear production after 24 weeks of treatment and not approved for relief of symptoms.

There remains an unmet medical need for a secondgeneration pharmaceutical treatment with faster onset of activity with the ability to improve both signs and symptoms of dry eye disease.

Inhibition of T-cell activation and trafficking to sites of inflammation



Activated CD4+ lymphocytes (Tcells) appear to play a central role in ocular surface inflammation associated with dry eye.3,4 Lifitegrast (SAR 1118) is an investigational small molecule aimed at inhibiting activation and mobility of T-cells.5 Normally these immune response cells are activated as part of the host defence process but under conditions of continuous exposure to stress factors (e.g., autoantigens, environmental insults, mechanical and osmotic stresses), can lead to a state of perpetual lymphocyte activation and migration. The unchecked cycle of Tcell migration, proliferation and cytokine release on the ocular surface leads to changes in the quality of the tear film that results in subsequent epitheliopathy and symptomatic discomfort for patients.


On a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest, how would you rate this article?
Your original vote has been tallied and is included in the ratings results.
View our top pages
Average rating for this page is: 2
WHAT DO YOU THINK?

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Rate this article
Your comments
Discuss on our forum
Follow us on Twitter

 

Survey
Which clear corneal incision technique do you use the most?
Three-plane incision
Single-plane angled manual incision
Three-plane incision
53%
Single-plane angled manual incision
47%
Source: Ophthalmology Times Europe,
Click here