Emerging nerve fibre bundles from SD-OCT - Ophthalmology Times Europe

ADVERTISEMENT

CATARACT

GLAUCOMA

REFRACTIVE

RETINA

Emerging nerve fibre bundles from SD-OCT

Ophthalmology Times Europe
Volume 8, Issue 4




While visual field measurements continue to be a primary tool in the diagnosis and management of glaucoma, a poor reproducibility and overall patient experience continues to motivate the need for more objective and patientfriendly structural measurements. Spectraldomain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) is a promising modality for providing such parameters, with retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thicknesses, ganglion cell layer (GCL) thicknesses and cuptodisc ratio measurements already being used. Nevertheless, with the limited correlation of current structural parameters with functional parameters, there is a continued interest in obtaining better structural parameters.

Thus, in a collaborative effort at The University of Iowa (also including glaucoma specialist Dr Young Kwon, retinal specialist and engineer Dr Michael Abràmoff, and engineers Dr Milan Sonka, Dr Kyungmoo Lee and Dr Meindert Niemeijer), we have recently been examining the use of nerve bundle patterns from SD-OCT. As a first step in this direction, we have demonstrated that a colourcoded correlation map resembling expected nerve fibre bundle patterns emerges through a structure–structure correlative analysis of the GCL and RNFL from SDOCT across subjects.1 The work, published in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,1 first involves using our three-dimensional image analysis methodology to obtain regional thickness measurements of the GCL in 66 macular locations and regional thickness measurements of the RNFL in 12 peripapillary wedge locations from each subject. Then, the resulting colour-coded correlation map is obtained by colour-coding each macular GCL region with the most correlative peripapillary wedge region.

Using 3D image analysis to obtain regional GCL and RNFL thickness measurements


Figure 1: Correlating regional macular ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness measurements with regional peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness measurements. (Top) Definition of 66 macular GCL grid regions and 12 peripapillary RNFL wedge regions for each eye (illustrated on macula-centred and optic-nerve-head-centred SD-OCT projection images) using fovea and neural canal opening for placement. (Bottom) Example plot of the RNFL thickness in the wedge region indicated with a star versus the GCL thickness of the grid region indicated with a circle across all 57 subjects.
To perform a structure–structure correlative analysis,1 we first obtain the thickness of the GCL in 66 macular grid regions and the thickness of the RNFL in 12 peripapillary wedge regions from the SDOCT volumes of each subject. In particular, the boundaries of the layers themselves are automatically detected within the SDOCT volumes using our previously reported threedimensional graph-theoretic approach.2,3 The regions of interest are defined by first aligning (i.e., registering) the macula-centred volume to the opticnerveheadcentred volume of each eye. After registration, the precise location of 66 macular grid regions and 12 peripapillary wedge regions can be defined, using the position of the fovea and automatically segmented neural canal opening4 for guidance (Figure 1, top). Mean layer thicknesses are then computed within each macular and peripapillary region for each eye. Note that as the process of obtaining regional thickness measurements depends on a number of underlying ophthalmic image analysis algorithms, interested readers are encouraged to refer to a recent review paper5 for a broad overview of the field.


On a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest, how would you rate this article?
Your original vote has been tallied and is included in the ratings results.
View our top pages
Average rating for this page is: 0
WHAT DO YOU THINK?

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Rate this article
Your comments
Discuss on our forum
Follow us on Twitter

 

Survey
Which clear corneal incision technique do you use the most?
Three-plane incision
Single-plane angled manual incision
Three-plane incision
53%
Single-plane angled manual incision
47%
Source: Ophthalmology Times Europe,
Click here