BAK: a better alternative to epithelium removal in cross linking - Ophthalmology Times Europe

ADVERTISEMENT

SEARCH
  • home
  • about us
  • contact us
  • subscribe
  • media kit request
 

CATARACT

GLAUCOMA

REFRACTIVE

RETINA

Tweet!
BAK: a better alternative to epithelium removal in cross linking
A variant of the standard CXL protocol where the epithelium is not removed.


Ophthalmology Times Europe

Key iconKey Points

  • By developing a variation of the standard cross linking protocol OTEurope's editorial advisory board member Roberto Pinelli and his team describe a technique using a riboflavin solution containing benzalkonium chloride. This has the potential to offer patients a less invasive, safer and faster CXL.



Cross-linking is the process of chemically joining two or more molecules by a covalent bond. Cross-linking reagents contain reactive ends to specific functional groups (primary amines, sulfhydryls, etc.) on proteins or other molecules. Because of the availability of several chemical groups in proteins and peptides that may be targeted, they are readily conjugated using different cross-linking methods. It is a well established method used in polymer industries for the stabilization of tissues. In medicine some applications of cross linking include chemical cross-linking using glutaraldehyde in the preparation of prosthetic heart valves, papraformaldehyde for tissue hardening in specimens being prepared for examination and UV cross-linking used to harden dentistry fillings.

Not long ago riboflavin/UVA corneal cross linking (CXL) was introduced to ophthalmic practice. Initially, it was aimed for the treatment of ectatic corneal conditions such as keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration and post excimer laser keratectesia. This is due to the formation of new covalent bonds between collagen fibrils and hence corneal rigidity is improved. More recently, other applications for its usage are emerging such as bullous keratopathy, infectious keratitis, corneal melting and the stabilization of post RK hyperopic shifts.

The standard protocol for CXL could be considered as moderately invasive as it requires mechanical removal of the epithelium. The drawbacks of this step include:

1. Prolonged surgical time.

2. Increased incidence of herpetic activation.

3. Increased incidence of developing haze.

4. Corneal oedema.

5. Postoperative pain and discomfort for many days.

6. Reduced visual acuity until epithelialization is complete and resolution of corneal oedema.


Figure 1 & 2: Light microscopy at X20 demonstrates the CXL occurance in the treated corneas (Figure 1) in comparison with the control (Figure 2).
This has motivated us to develop a variant of the standard technique in which the epithelium is not removed offering patients a less invasive, safer and faster CXL, while retaining the efficacy of the standard technique. This technique applies a riboflavin solution containing benzalkonium chloride (BAK) directly onto intact epithelium. BAK, the most commonly used preservative in ophthalmic medications, is also a tensioactive substance. A tensioactive substance, surfactant or an active surface agent are chemical substances that change the surface tension value, and hence facilitate the penetration of other substances through biological membranes. Therefore, BAK aids the penetration of riboflavin into the corneal stroma without the need for removing the epithelium.

We demonstrated the results of tensioactive CXL in rabbit corneas at the IV international congress of CXL held in Dresden, Germany last December. In our results the following signs by light microscopy (Figure 1) demonstrated the occurance of CXL in the treated corneas in comparison to control ones:

  • The epithelial surface was straighter (retained curvature due to increased stiffness).
  • The epithelium was more compact.
  • In the stroma, the fibres showed more compact arrangement, and were straight compared to the wavy fibres in the stroma of the control corneas. This effect was noticed in the upper 50% (approximately) of the stroma.
  • The deep stroma adjacent to the endothelium looked the same as the control.

BAK with the concentration used in commonly available ophthalmic medications and in the riboflavin solution used in this experiment (patented by Dr Pinelli in Italy), can cause lifting and peeling of some superficial epithelial cells with exposure of the second layer of cells (wing cells), with no change in the basal epithelial cells nor the endothelial cells. These are the immediate side effects of BAK, whereas other side effects from the chronic exposure are not relevant to the CXL treatment as it is rarely repeated.

From this we conclude that the drawbacks of using BAK to avoid epithelial removal in CXL are much less than those resulting from epithelium removal, hence offer a less invasive procedure with less complications and increased patient comfort.

On a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest, how would you rate this article?
Your original vote has been tallied and is included in the ratings results.
View our top pages
Average rating for this page is: 6.78
WHAT DO YOU THINK?

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Rate this article
Your comments
Discuss on our forum
Follow us on Twitter

 

Survey
What's your view of online learning/education for ophthalmology?
It would help me do my job better
Europe is well served
Europe is poorly served
Needs to be nationally orientated
Needs to be European orientated
Would never use
It would help me do my job better
100%
Europe is well served
0%
Europe is poorly served
0%
Needs to be nationally orientated
0%
Needs to be European orientated
0%
Would never use
0%
View Results
Thank you for voting
Source: Ophthalmology Times Europe,
Click here