Key Points
- Long-term data suggest that most donor tissue remains clear up to at least 9 years in eyes that have undergone deep lamellar
endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK). Although long-term data are unavailable with a newer technique, Descemet's stripping automated
endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), 24-month outcomes suggest that endothelial cell loss plateaus earlier in DSAEK than in DLEK
cases. Protecting both central and peripheral donor endothelium during surgery is paramount to long-term graft survival.
Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) procedures continue to evolve, and researchers have begun to accumulate enough data to compare
outcomes from techniques considered new less than a decade ago with still newer ones. Long-term data from a series of deep
lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK) cases begun in 2000 are available, as is information on cases performed more recently
with the newer variation, Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).
Findings show that despite declining cell count, 95% of DLEK eyes remain clear past the 5-year visit. Further, graft replacement
has not been necessary in patients with even longer follow-ups, said Mark A. Terry, MD, who presented the latest findings
from his ongoing prospective study of EK procedures at the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.
Dr. Terry, director of corneal services, Devers Eye Institute, Portland, OR, was the first surgeon in the United States to
perform any form of EK and has developed both the DLEK and DSAEK procedures.
He reported that the rate of endothelial cell loss, the key factor for the long-term success or failure of EK procedures,
appears to plateau between 4 and 5 years after DLEK surgery. He added that shorter-term results of DSAEK cases are very encouraging
and seem to show an early plateau of cell density at 6 to 24 months postoperatively.
DLEK casesFactors that contribute to late graft failure and endothelial cell loss in EK cases include surgical trauma at the initial
surgery, graft dislocation and rebubbling, and graft rejection.
Dr. Terry reviewed these factors in a series of the first 36 DLEK cases he performed, in which he had used a 9-mm incision
for insertion. The dislocation rate was 1/36 (2.8%), whereas the graft failure rate was 0. This compared well with his series
of 500 DSAEK cases, performed by a group of five surgeons who used an identical technique with a 5-mm incision, he said. The
dislocation rate was 9/500 (1.8%), and both the primary graft failure and pupillary block rates were 0.
"We have a very low (1.8%) dislocation rate and also minimal surgical trauma as evidenced by our primary graft failure rate
of 0 in 500 initial DSAEK cases. Therefore, this EK series likely represents a best-case scenario in terms of long-term cell
loss and graft survival," Dr. Terry said. "Graft survival and endothelial cell loss in a series by other surgeons that might
have a higher dislocation rate and a higher rate of primary graft failure would likely fare worse in the long term than the
results reported here with our series. Therefore, what I'm reporting in terms of long-term graft survival might not be applicable
to other studies."
DSAEK cases
He said that some small cases series of DSAEK, a form of EK developed within the past several years, have reported a cell
loss rate of 38% to 50%. Larger studies have shown a much lower rate of 25% to 35%, however, and a review of the first 285
cases performed by Dr. Terry's group found a cell loss rate of 30% at 6 months and 12 months and 31% at 24 months.
Similarly, he said that a recent editorial by Frank Price, MD, of Indianapolis, mentioned that the endothelial cell loss in
more than 100 of his DSAEK cases was minimal between 2 and 3 years, following a similar percent cell loss in the first 6 months
postoperatively.